Table 3.

Performances of miPred and miR-KDE for the NH3350 dataset in terms of genus.

	%SE	%SP	%ACC	%Fm	%MCC
Vertebrata
miPred	95.3%	88.8%	92.1%	92.3%	84.3%
miR-KDE	93.4%	92.8%	93.1%	93.2%	86.3%
with miPred's %SP	96.1%	88.8%	92.5%	92.7%	85.2%
Arthropoda
miPred	98.8%	89.0%	93.9%	94.2%	88.2%
miR-KDE	100.0%	92.0%	96.0%	96.2%	92.3%
Viridiplantae
miPred	98.2%	93.6%	95.9%	96.0%	91.9%
miR-KDE	98.4%	95.0%	96.7%	96.8%	93.4%
Nematoda
miPred	97.2%	90.4%	93.8%	94.0%	87.8%
miR-KDE	97.2%	92.7%	94.9%	95.0%	89.9%
Viruses
miPred	97.2%	93.1%	95.1%	95.2%	90.4%
miR-KDE	94.4%	97.2%	95.8%	95.8%	91.7%
with miPred's %SP	98.6%	93.1%	95.8%	95.9%	91.8%
Overall
miPred	97.3% ± 1.3%	91.0% ± 2.3%	94.1% ± 1.5%	94.3% ± 1.4%	88.5% ± 2.9%
miR-KDE	96.7% ± 2.7%	93.9% ± 2.1%	95.3% ± 1.4%	95.4% ± 1.4%	90.7% ± 2.8%
with miPred's %SP	98.1% ± 1.5%	92.3% ± 2.2%	95.2% ± 1.6%	95.3% ± 1.6%	90.5% ± 3.3%

The best performance among each dataset is highlighted in bold.