Skip to main content
. 2008 Oct 29;10(1):11–23. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbn045

Table 2:

Multiple alignment programme scores for the alignment reference sets in Balibase 3.0

MSA programme Reference 1 Equidistant sequences
Reference 2 Family with orphans Reference 3 Divergent sub families Reference 4 Large extensions Reference 5 Large insertions Reference 7 Trans-membrane proteins Reference 9 Linear motifs
V1: <20% V2: 20–40%
ProbCons 0.65 0.93 0.90 0.79 0.86 0.88 0.81 0.68
36.8% 68.2% 34.1% 43.3% 63.4% 62.5% 50.0% 50.7%
MAFFT 0.45 0.88 0.88 0.74 0.83 0.79 0.81 0.66
44.7% 20.4% 51.2% 46.7% 41.5% 31.2% 37.5% 22.4%
Muscle 0.56 0.90 0.88 0.76 0.84 0.83 0.79 0.66
13.2% 4.5% 9.8% 10.0% 9.8% 6.2% 12.5% 4.5%
ClustalW 0.46 0.85 0.86 0.62 0.75 0.61 0.69 0.63
5.3% 6.8% 4.9% 0.0% 4.9% 0.0% 0.0% 22.4%

For each programme, the mean SP scores are shown, as well as the number of times the programme achieved the best alignment score, expressed as a percentage of the total number of reference alignments. The programme with the highest percentage of best scores is highlighted in bold. References 6 and 8 were excluded, since the tests contained non-linear sequences that cannot be aligned by most multiple alignment methods.