Table 2.

Comparison with previous studies using computational predictions, overlap with gold standards and capture–recapture theory

Method	FNR (%)	FDR (%)	Reference
Yeast
Prediction	–	72–84	(Deane et al., 2002)
Overlap	>70	>50	(von Mering et al., 2002)
Overlap	43–71	–	(Edwards et al., 2002)a
Overlap	76–96	–	(Edwards et al., 2002)b
Overlap	–	50	(Sprinzak et al., 2003)
Overlap	80–85	–	(Salwinski et al., 2004)
Overlap	50	70–90	(Hart et al., 2006)
Recap	52	24	(Huang et al., 2007)
Overlap	62	52	This workc
Recap	51	26	This work
Worm
Prediction	22–100	–	(Salwinski et al., 2004)
Recap	47	44	(Huang et al., 2007)
Recap	42	48	This work
Fly
Prediction	74–96	–	(Salwinski et al., 2004)
Recap	32	41	(Huang et al., 2007)
Recap	28	44	This work

^aEstimated using crystal structure data.

^bEstimated using MIPS complexes data.

^cOverlap from comparison with data from Yu et al. (2008).

Bold values indicate results from this work.