Skip to main content
. 2009 Feb 11;2008:926090. doi: 10.1155/2008/926090

Table 4.

Comparison of map distances based on common marker intervals between three molecular linkage maps of tomatoa.

Interval Chr. Marker interval map distance (cM)
(L × PM3)b (L × PM2)c (L × PM3)/(L × PM2) (L × P)d (L × PM3)/(L × P)
TG70-TG273 1 24.3 23.8 1.0 8.9 2.7*
TG554-TG453 2 6.6 0.0 NA*
TG453-TG145 2 0.4 6.8 0.1*
TG145-CT103 2 10.3 10.1 1.0
CT176-TG582 2 5.6 18.9 0.3* 15.5 0.4*
CT59-TG620 2 2.6 7.0 0.4* 0.0 NA*
TG114-TG132 3 0.0 8.9 N/A* 15.4 NA*
TG66-CT225B 3 6.6 1.8 3.7*
CT225B-CT82 3 9.8 6.3 1.6
CT82-TG515 3 12.7 14.8 0.9 3.9 3.3*
TG123-TG182 4 12.5 14.2 0.9
TG182-TG609 4 6.7 5.5 1.2
TG609-CT178 4 11.8 11.1 1.1
CT167-CT93 5 19.3 8.9 2.2* 12.9 1.5
TG503-TG96 5 2.5 3.2 0.8
TG274-TG590 6 4.6 10.4 0.4*
TG356-TG365 6 13.0 11.9 1.1 4.1 3.2*
C54-TG279 6 4.0 10.2 0.4* NA
TG183-TG128 7 15.7 2.3 6.8*
TG128-CT226 7 3.1 3.5 0.9 1.6 1.9
TG128-TG174 7 19.3 13.6 1.4 10.7 1.8
TG176-CD40 8 8.7 0.0 NA*
CT265-TG294 8 12.8 9.6 1.3 13.1 1.0
TG486-CD3 9 1.7 1.3 1.3
CD3-CT279 9 11.3 5.6 2.0*
CT279-TG35 9 1.9 0.0 NA
TG408-CD34 10 4.9 22.9 0.2*
CD34-TG403 10 30.1 37.5 0.8 7.4 4.1*
TG629-TG497 11 0.0 0.0 NA
TG30-CT65 11 16.7 3.9 4.3*
TG68-CT79 12 3.3 6.7 0.5* 14.4 0.2*
CT99-TG618 12 5.4 0.8 6.8*
TG618-TG111 12 12.5 6.1 2.0*
TG111-TG565 12 3.0 0.0 NA*
CT156-TG473 12 6.1 19.1 0.3*
TG473-CD2 12 0.0 1.8 0.0

aOnly common marker intervals that were different in length by at least twofold between L × PM1 and either L × PM2 or L × P linkage maps are shown.

bL × PM3: Solanum lycopersicum (NCEBR-1) × S. pimpinellifolium (LA2093) map (present map).

cL × PM2: S. lycopersicum (NC84173) × S. pimpinellifolium (LA722) map [7].

dL × P: S. lycopersicum (VF36-Tm2) × S. pennellii (LA716) map [5].

*Difference in interval length by at least twofold. Dashes (—) indicate no common interval for comparison. NA indicates a number divided by 0.0, 0.0 over a number, or no comparison was made.