Table 3.
Number of treatments needed | Number of groups, n (%) | |
1 – 4 | 1 (13%) | |
2 – 3 | 1 (13%) | |
2 – 4 | 1 (13%) | |
2 – 5 | 1 (13%) | |
4 | 1 (13%) | |
3 – 5 | 1 (13%) | |
3 – 6 | 1 (13%) | |
3 – 9 | 1 (13%) | |
Duration of treatments, weeks | Number of groups, n (%) | |
2 | 2 (25%) | |
2 – 3 | 2 (25%) | |
2 – 4 | 2 (25%) | |
1 1/2 – 2 | 1 (13%) | |
4 – 5 | 1 (13%) | |
Number of treatments per week | ||
1st week | 2nd week | 3rd week |
1–2* | 2* | 0* |
2 | 1 – 2 | 0 – 1 |
2 | 0 – 2 | 0 |
2 – 3 | 1 – 2 | 1 |
2 – 3 | 1 – 2 | 0 |
2 | 1 – 2 | 0 – 1 |
1 – 2 | 1 | 0 – 1 |
* This sequence of treatment numbers seems illogical. There might be a mistake in recording.