Table 1.
Demographic information and clinical profiles, as characterized by the Western Aphasia Battery (Kertesz, 1992) and Quantitative Production Analysis (Saffran, Berndt & Schwartz, 1989). Low values of the Aphasia Quotient indicate greater severity.
| Western Aphasia Battery
|
Quantitative Production Analysis
|
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Participant | Sex | Age | Education | Mos. Post Onset | Classification | Aphasia Quotient | Wds Per Min | Mdn L U | Prop Cl Class | Prop Wds in Ss |
| BAC | M | 57 | 19 | 118 | A | 86.6 | 39.2 | 7.0 | 0.55 | 0.99 |
| TB | F | 35 | 12 | 10 | A | 75.1 | 100.4 | 5.0 | 0.55 | 1.00 |
| MD | M | 54 | 12 | 96 | A | 81.6 | 45.9 | 5.0 | 0.56 | 0.79 |
| KAC | M | 61 | 11 | 16 | C | 72.9 | 55.4 | 5.0 | 0.51 | 0.80 |
| OE | M | 60 | 11 | 29 | A | 93.6 | 34.9 | 5.0 | 0.55 | 0.95 |
| MX | F | 39 | 12 | 49 | B | 67.2 | 16.3 | 2.0 | 0.40 | 0.50 |
| TG | F | 68 | 12 | 20 | A | 91.2 | 85.8 | 5.0 | 0.52 | 0.93 |
| CT | F | 41 | 10 | 22 | B | 69.7 | 14.4 | 4.0 | 0.45 | 0.42 |
| MO | M | 60 | 13 | 135 | B | 70.0 | 42.3 | 4.0 | 0.54 | 0.71 |
| SL | M | 50 | 12 | 36 | A | 92.7 | 55.8 | 5.0 | 0.45 | 0.82 |
| EC | F | 56 | 17 | 175 | B | 68.2 | 32.2 | 3.0 | 0.46 | 0.52 |
| EAC | F | 50 | 17 | 52 | A | 84.4 | 45.4 | 4.5 | 0.52 | 0.75 |
| DD | M | 56 | 16 | 28 | B | 53.1 | 19.9 | 1.0 | 0.29 | 0.23 |
| ED | F | 80 | 16 | 15 | W | 39.3 | 164.8 | 5.5 | 0.59 | 0.96 |
| LF | M | 53 | 20 | 25 | W | 66.1 | 32.5 | 8.5 | 0.52 | 0.88 |
| BT | M | 68 | 14 | 82 | B | 68.8 | 17.9 | 1.0 | 0.21 | 0.10 |
| DAN | F | 75 | 11 | 19 | C | 66.7 | 71.0 | 3.5 | 0.52 | 0.71 |
| NQ | F | 62 | 12 | 62 | B | 63.6 | 32.8 | 3.0 | 0.44 | 0.40 |
B (Broca), A (Anomic), W (Wernicke), C (Conduction), Mdn L U (Median length of utterance), Prop Cl Class (Proportion closed class words, relative to all scored words), Prop Wds in Ss (Proportion of words that fall within sentence boundaries).