Table 2.

Performance on the Philadelphia Naming Test (Roach, Schwartz, Martin, Grewal & Brecher, 1996) and Pyramids and Palms Tests (Howard & Patterson, 1992).

	Philadelphia Naming Test				Pyramids and Palms Test
Participant	Correct	Semantic Err	Persev - U	Persev - All	All Pictures	Word to Pictures
BAC	0.93	0.03	0.00	0.01	0.96	0.98
TB	0.79	0.10	0.00	0.02	0.92	0.87
MD	0.89	0.02	0.00	0.03	0.90	0.94
KAC	0.38	0.02	0.00	0.01	0.90	0.85
OE	0.82	0.03	0.00	0.02	0.92	0.96
MX	0.74	0.06	0.00	0.01	0.77	0.85
TG	0.71	0.07	0.00	0.05	0.94	0.92
CT	0.80	0.06	0.00	0.02	0.90	0.88
MO	0.77	0.04	0.00	0.00	0.96	0.92
SL	0.87	0.07	0.00	0.01	0.92	0.88
EC	0.62	0.05	0.01	0.05	0.88	0.90
EAC	0.79	0.04	0.00	0.04	0.90	0.87
DD	0.39	0.11	0.01	0.06	0.88	0.85
ED	0.07	0.09	0.05	0.12	0.88	0.83
LF	0.64	0.05	0.01	0.01	0.83	n/a
BT	0.69	0.13	0.17	0.29	0.96	0.90
DAN	0.26	0.03	0.03	0.06	0.87	0.79
NQ	0.62	0.06	0.01	0.03	0.83	0.77

Persev-U, Proportion of whole word perseverations unrelated to the target, relative to total responses; Persev-All, Proportion of whole word perseverations unrelated or related (semantically or phonologically) to the target.