Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jan 15.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2008 Sep 24;44(2):399–410. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.009

Table 3.

Localization results of goal function scan (GFS), minimum norm least squares (MNLS), rotating (RotDip) and moving dipole fit (MovDip) and standardized low resolution electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA) in Talairach coordinates and the localization differences between those approaches are presented. GOF denotes the goodness-of-fit. For sLORETA, the indicated GOF is the GOF of the embedded MNLS approach before standardization.

Inverse Location Location differences GOF
method (in mm) GFS MNLS RotDip MovDip sLORETA
(in mm)
GFS (−52;4;47) - 6.6 2.6 2.5;2.3 0 97.02
MNLS (−50;−1;49)
(−50;−1;49)		 6.6 - 5.9 6.2;5.8 6.6 99.99
99.99
RotDip (−53;3;49) 2.6 5.9 - 0.9;1.9 2.6 97.1
MovDip (−54;3;48)
(−52;3;49)		 2.5
2.3		 6.2
5.8		 0.9
1.9		 -
-		 2.5
2.2		 97.2
97.1
sLORETA (−52;4;47)
(−52;4;47)		 0 6.6 2.6 2.5;2.2 -
-		 99.99
99.99