Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Oct 14.
Published in final edited form as: Mutat Res. 2008 Aug 5;645(1-2):9–18. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2008.07.013

Table 2.

The effect of IRs of Ty1 on DSB repair in rad51Δ and rad54Δ diploids.

Strain IRa No. Colonies tested % Event for phenotype of coloniesb
Viability YEP-Gal (%)
Ade+Thr+ Ade+Thr   Ade+/−Thr AdeThr
or Ade+Thr+/− Ura+ Ura+/− Ura Ura+/− Ura
RAD51c
(YLS100)
FS2 638 98.7 1.0 0.3 0.0 93 ± 6
rad51Δ
(AM960)
FS2 1304 2.2 7.5 6.3 4.5 56.9 9.5 13.1 92 ± 12
rad51Δ
(AM990)
Ty1αΔ
Ty1βΔ
2038 0.5 2.4 7.4 10.0 14.4 24.1 41.2* 93 ± 13
rad51Δ
(AM991)
Ty1αΔ
Ty1βΔ
402 0.0 8.2 2.2 10.2 17.0 17.0 45.4* 88 ± 4
rad51Δ
(AM992)
Ty1αΔ
Ty1βΔ
(ars310-Δ1)
668 0.6 3.4 2.4 10.2 17.8 23.7 41.9* 82 ± 6
rad54Δ
(AM993)
FS2 550 1.5 2.9 0 4.9 16.4 22.7 51.6* 84 ± 9
a

Indicates inverted DNA repeats present in the MATa –containing copy of chromosome III undergoing DSB repair.

b

Some colonies were sectored for one or more nutritional markers. A colony that was half Ade+ and half Ade- is indicated as Ade+/−

c

Data for RAD51 diploid YLS100 (except for viability) are taken from Signon et. al. [24]. The viability for this diploid was determined in this study.

*

Indicates a statistically significant difference from the isogenic rad51Δ diploid strain with intact FS2 region (P<0.001).