Table 3.
Conjunction analysis (EFT > BL AND CT > BL)Patients AND (EFT > BL AND CT > BL)Controls of the fMRI data
| Side | x | y | z | k | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Middle occipital gyrus | left | − 45 | − 78 | 3 | 173 |
| right | 24 | − 93 | − 3 | 4 | |
| right | 33 | − 84 | 12 | 4 | |
| right | 30 | − 99 | 3 | 1 | |
| Intraparietal sulcus | right | 30 | − 66 | 42 | 72 |
| left | − 24 | − 78 | 33 | 10 | |
| Fusiform gyrus | right | 39 | − 78 | − 12 | 33 |
| Inferior occipital gyrus | right | 39 | − 93 | 3 | 4 |
| Lingual gyrus | left | − 12 | − 75 | 3 | 4 |
| Thalamus | left | − 24 | − 30 | 0 | 2 |
| Superior parietal gyrus | left | − 27 | − 60 | 57 | 1 |
| Anterior insula | right | 33 | 24 | 0 | 1 |
This table lists the results from the conjunction analysis (implemented by inclusive masking) shown by Fig. 3. All results are significant at p < 0.05 at the voxel level, corrected for multiple comparisons across the whole brain. Note that because of the multiple masking involved in this analysis, it is not meaningful to list individual T scores. k = number of activated voxels; x, y, z = coordinates of local maxima in MNI space.