Skip to main content
. 2009 Feb;181(2):367–377. doi: 10.1534/genetics.108.097345

TABLE 1.

Features of the HorkaD- and the horkarvP2-carrying females and males

Analysis of the females
Analysis of the male offspringc
Test perioda Dead embryos with cuticle (%) Rate of offspring productionb XX//X0 mosaic
Genotype Tested Offspring XX Total %
HorkaD/+ 851 16.3 0 0 4304 432 9.1
HorkaD/Dp(3;3)d 1704 8.8 0 0 2.1–28.8
HorkaD/Dp(3;3)Antprv8 261 18.0 100 3 6.4 × 10−4 116 20 14.7
HorkaD/Df(3R)dsx15 161 19.5 0 0 178 14 7.3
HorkaD/lds98.1 310 20.7 0 0 276 2 0.7
TG+; HorkaD/+ 258 19.2 93 0 363 14 3.7
    +/+; TGHD5.1 147 16.7 28 0 167 13 7.2
    +/+; TGHD5.5 188 15.5 25 0 246 8 3.2
horkarvP2/Df(3R)dsx15 180 15.2 20.6 194 0
horkarvP2/+ 11 7.0 3.4 2695 35.0 3433 0
horkarvP2/lds98.1 85 12.3 21.0 298 0
TG+; horkarvP2/Df(3R)dsx15 5 7.0 11.0 087 31.1
TG+; horkarvP2/lds98.1 7 7.0 8 649 33.7

horkarvP2 is a functionally null allele and lds98.1 is a lodestar null allele (Girdham and Glover 1991).

a

Average test period per female (days).

b

Offspring/(female × day).

c

The males were mated with y v f mal females (XX) and the XX offspring flies were screened for XX//X0 mosaics.

d

Pooled data from 17 Dp(3;3) tandem duplications with the exception of Dp(3;3)Antprv8.