Skip to main content
. 2009 Feb 27;4(2):e4646. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004646

Table 2. Pathways.

Rivers Railways Ports Lakes H
N120 W 12261 13381 17345 24336 81
p value 0.908 0.128 <0.001 <0.001 0.956
Median (obs.) 0.160 0.038 5.5 0.026 2853.8
Median (rand.) 0.148 0.034 2 0.004 1168.2
N60 W 11800 14881 16379 16706 20320
p value 0.645 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Median (obs.) 0.160 0.046 1 0.029 2935.3
Median (rand.) 0.157 0.033 0 0.002 1169.6
N30 W 12164 16069 15088 15835 20354
p value 0.997 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Median (obs.) 0.159 0.054 0 0.009 3074.4
Median (rand.) 0.161 0.032 0 0 1019.2

Results of the Wilcoxon test to compare the effects of rivers, river ports, lakes, railways and human population density (H) between infested points and random points, for three neighbourhoods (N120, N60, N30). The sample size of both datasets (observed and random data) was n = 156.