Table 2. Pathways.
Rivers | Railways | Ports | Lakes | H | ||
N120 | W | 12261 | 13381 | 17345 | 24336 | 81 |
p value | 0.908 | 0.128 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.956 | |
Median (obs.) | 0.160 | 0.038 | 5.5 | 0.026 | 2853.8 | |
Median (rand.) | 0.148 | 0.034 | 2 | 0.004 | 1168.2 | |
N60 | W | 11800 | 14881 | 16379 | 16706 | 20320 |
p value | 0.645 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
Median (obs.) | 0.160 | 0.046 | 1 | 0.029 | 2935.3 | |
Median (rand.) | 0.157 | 0.033 | 0 | 0.002 | 1169.6 | |
N30 | W | 12164 | 16069 | 15088 | 15835 | 20354 |
p value | 0.997 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
Median (obs.) | 0.159 | 0.054 | 0 | 0.009 | 3074.4 | |
Median (rand.) | 0.161 | 0.032 | 0 | 0 | 1019.2 |
Results of the Wilcoxon test to compare the effects of rivers, river ports, lakes, railways and human population density (H) between infested points and random points, for three neighbourhoods (N120, N60, N30). The sample size of both datasets (observed and random data) was n = 156.