Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Feb 22.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Neurosci. 2007 Dec 9;11(1):95–102. doi: 10.1038/nn2020

Table 1.

Population summary (N=557 cells). Results obtained pooling trials with the three juice pairs. The first column indicates the number of cells modulated by the offer type in each time window (ANOVA, p<0.001). Of the 557 cells in our data set, 351 (63%) passed the ANOVA criterion in at least one time window. The three columns on the right indicate the number of responses classified as encoding each of the three variables. Since OFC responses are typically menu invariant, this classification is based on simple regressions of neuronal responses onto different variables. A variable “explains” a response if the slope of the regression differs significantly from zero (p<0.05); responses explained by more than one variable are assigned to the variable with the highest R2. Responses that pass the ANOVA criterion but are not explained by any variable (48/1,019=5%, unclassified) do not appear in the three columns on the right.

offer value chosen value taste

1 pre-offer 0 0 1
208 post-offer 75 80 51
163 late delay 43 47 60
103 pre-go 35 32 29
71 RT 18 27 17
239 pre-juice 46 58 127
234 post-juice 51 61 113

1,019 total
351 at least one