Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Feb 23.
Published in final edited form as: Omega (Westport). 2008;58(2):87–105. doi: 10.2190/om.58.2.a

Table 2. Personal and Situational Factors Associated with the Perceived Importance and Experience of Humor, Laughter, & Happiness (HLH) Among Recently Bereaved Persons, Living After Loss Study (n = 292).

EXPERIENCE OF HLH
(Range = 5 to 25)
IMPORTANCE OF HLH
(Range = 2 to 10)
Correlation Mean Std Dev Sig. Correlation Mean Std Dev Sig.
Total Sample 20.5 (3.7) 8.7 (1.2)
Age a 0.04 ns 0.04 ns
Sexb
 Female 20.3 (3.8) ns 8.7 (1.2) ns
 Male 20.7 (3.4) 8.7 (1.2)
Education c
 High School or Less 19.8 (4.3) ns 8.8 (1.1) ns
 Some College 20.2 (3.6) 8.6 (1.3)
 College Grad or More 20.9 (3.4) 8.8 (1.1)
Race c
 White 20.7 (3.3) * 8.8 (1.1 *
 Black 21.5 (3.6) 8.9 (1.0
 Other 17.3 (5.8) 8.1 (1.8)
Site b
 San Francisco 20.0 (4.3) ns 8.7 (1.3) ns
 Salt Lake City 20.7 (3.2) 8.7 (1.1)
Death Forewarning b
 Expected Death 21.1 (3.1) * 8.9 (1.1) *
 Did Not Expect Death 19.7 (4.1) 8.6 (1.3)
Weeks Bereaved a 0.07 ns 0.07 ns
Years Married a 0.09 ns 0.04 ns
Marital Happiness a
(1= very unhappy; 7= very happy)
-0.11 ns -0.01 ns
*

Association is statistically significant at p < 0.05 level (2-tailed)

ns

Association is not statistically significant

a

Correlation analysis assessed bivariate statistical association

b

Independent Samples t-test assessed statistical differences between categories

c

One-way ANOVA assessed statistical differences between categories with Scheffe posthoc pairwise comparisons (Blacks and Whites were statistically different from those in the other category)