Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Feb 23.
Published in final edited form as: Omega (Westport). 2008;58(2):87–105. doi: 10.2190/om.58.2.a

Table 3.

Depression and Grief Scores Across Categories of HLH Experience & Importance

% of Total Sample DEPRESSION
(range = 0 to 15)
GRIEF
(range = 13 to 65)


Mean Adjusted Mean + Mean Adjusted Mean +
Total Sample n=292 4.1 4.1 43.2 43.2
High Experience of HLH 32% 2.2 * 2.8 * 38.8 * 40.2 *
Lower Experience of HLH 68% 5.0 4.8 45.2 44.5
High Importance of HLH 57% 3.3 * 3.7 * 41.9 * 42.9
Lower Importance of HLH 43% 5.3 4.1 45.0 43.6
High Experience, High Importance 30% 2.2 * 2.4 * 39.2 * 40.2 *
High Experience, Lower Importance 2% 3.0 3.3 34.2 36.7
Lower Experience, High Importance 27% 4.5 4.3 44.9 43.9
Lower Experience, Lower Importance 41% 5.4 5.4 45.5 45.1
+

Adjusted means were calculated from OLS regression equations that control for personal and situational factors (age, sex, education, race, site, death forewarning, weeks bereaved, length of marriage, marital happiness). Full regression tables are available from the author by request.

*

p < 0.05. Statistical significance between categories was assessed by Independent Sample T-Tests and One-Way Anovas for the unadjusted means, and by OLS regression analyses in the adjusted means.