TABLE 2.
Dietary correlates of overweight in children 5–12 y of age in Bogotá, Colombia1
| Child is overweight or obese2
|
Unadjusted prevalence ratio (95% CI)4
|
Adjusted prevalence ratio Model 1 (95% CI)6
|
Adjusted prevalence ratio Model 2 (95% CI)6
|
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adherence to dietary patterns | n | % (n) | P3 | P5 | P5 | P5 | |||
| Snacking pattern | 0.17 | 0.13 | 0.03 | 0.06 | |||||
| Q1 (lowest adherence) | 234 | 6.0 (14) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Q2 | 240 | 13.3 (32) | 2.23 (1.22, 4.07) | 2.10 (1.15, 3.84) | 1.98 (1.09, 3.59) | ||||
| Q3 | 241 | 13.7 (33) | 2.29 (1.26, 4.16) | 2.11 (1.15, 3.86) | 1.80 (0.99, 3.26) | ||||
| Q4 (highest adherence) | 239 | 10.0 (24) | 1.68 (0.89, 3.17) | 2.09 (1.03, 4.23) | 1.95 (0.99, 3.84) | ||||
| Cheaper protein | 0.01 | 0.007 | 0.03 | 0.04 | |||||
| Q1 (lowest adherence) | 240 | 12.5 (30) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Q2 | 239 | 15.1 (36) | 1.20 (0.77, 1.89) | 1.22 (0.77, 1.94) | 1.21 (0.78, 1.89) | ||||
| Q3 | 241 | 8.7 (21) | 0.70 (0.41, 1.18) | 0.66 (0.37, 1.16) | 0.71 (0.42, 1.22) | ||||
| Q4 (highest adherence) | 234 | 6.8 (16) | 0.55 (0.31, 0.98) | 0.64 (0.35, 1.19) | 0.65 (0.35, 1.19) | ||||
| Traditional/starch | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.22 | 0.66 | |||||
| Q1 (lowest adherence) | 238 | 11.3 (27) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Q2 | 238 | 14.3 (34) | 1.26 (0.79, 2.02) | 1.18 (0.73, 1.90) | 1.35 (0.84, 2.17) | ||||
| Q3 | 241 | 10.0 (24) | 0.88 (0.52, 1.47) | 0.88 (0.53, 1.46) | 0.96 (0.58, 1.59) | ||||
| Q4 (highest adherence) | 237 | 7.6 (18) | 0.67 (0.38, 1.18) | 0.71 (0.37, 1.39) | 0.94 (0.49, 1.81) | ||||
| Animal protein | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.31 | 0.65 | |||||
| Q1 (lowest adherence) | 236 | 10.6 (25) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Q2 | 240 | 8.8 (21) | 0.83 (0.48, 1.43) | 0.79 (0.45, 1.39) | 0.82 (0.47, 1.44) | ||||
| Q3 | 240 | 14.2 (34) | 1.34 (0.82, 2.17) | 1.37 (0.83, 2.27) | 1.33 (0.82, 2.16) | ||||
| Q4 (highest adherence) | 238 | 9.7 (23) | 0.91 (0.53, 1.56) | 1.09 (0.60, 1.97) | 0.92 (0.51, 1.65) | ||||
In a subsample of 954 children with dietary information.
According to the IOTF classification (9).
Cochrane-Armitage test.
Unadjusted prevalence ratios and 95% CI are from binomial regression models with ‘child is overweight or obese’ as the outcome.
Test for trend.
Adjusted prevalence ratios and 95% CI are from binomial regression models with ‘child is overweight or obese’ as the outcome. Covariates in Model 1 included child's age, sex, and total energy intake. Covariates in model 2 (n = 893) included child's age, sex, total energy intake, maternal BMI, and number of household assets. The indicator method was used for missing values in the number of household assets and maternal BMI variables.