Table 3.
Performance at admission or a fixed time thereafter.
| Admission SOFA | AUC | Brier | H/C-statistics | Compared with | AUC | Brier | H/C-statistics | Mort. |
| Ho et al (2007) [11] | 0.791 | 0.1 | C = 7.97 | APACHE II | 0.858 | 0.09 | H | |
| p = 0.437 | APS | 0.829 | 0.09 | C = 2.9 p = 0.890 | H | |||
| RPHICU | 0.822 | 0.09 | C = 4.7 p = 0.198 | H | ||||
| Holtfreter et al (2006) [12] | 0.72 | APACHE II | 0.785 | H | ||||
| Zygun et al (2005) [14] | 0.67 | U = 8.8 | MODS | 0.62 | H/C = 10.28 | H | ||
| p = 0.38 | p = 0.17 | |||||||
| Timsit et al (2002) [15] | 0.72 | U = 4.55 | LODS | 0.726 | H/C = 10.4 | H | ||
| p = 0.8 | p = 0.16 | |||||||
| Pettilä et al (2002) [17] | 0.776 | APACHE III | 0.825 | H | ||||
| LODS | 0.805 | H | ||||||
| MODS | 0.695 | H | ||||||
| Khwannimit (2007) [10] | 0.8786 | LODS | 0.8802 | H | ||||
| MODS | 0.8606 | |||||||
| Gosling et al (2006) [13] | 0.61 | APACHE II | 0.62 | I | ||||
| Zygun et al (2005) [14] | 0.67 | U = 11.66 | MODS | 0.63 | H/C = 14.29 | I | ||
| p = 0.17 | p = 0.05 | |||||||
| Moreno et al (1999) [21] | 0.772 | I | ||||||
| Bota et al (2002) [16] | 0.872 | APACHE II | 0.88 | U | ||||
| MODS | 0.856 | U | ||||||
| Ferreira et al (2001) [19] | 0.79 | I | ||||||
| Janssens et al (2000) [20] | 0.82 | SAPS II | 0.77 | H | ||||
| Other scoring moments | AUC | Brier | H/C-statistics | Compared to | AUC | Brier | H/C-statistics | Mort. |
| Bota et al (2002) [16] 48 hours | 0.844 | MODS | 0.834 | U | ||||
| Ferreira et al (2001) [19] 48 hours | 0.78 | I | ||||||
| Bota et al (2002) [16] 96 hours | 0.847 | MODS | 0.861 | U | ||||
| Ferreira et al (2001) [19] 96 hours | 0.82 | I | ||||||
| Timsit et al (2002) [15], day 2 | 0.742 | U = 11.1 | LODS | 0.742 | H | |||
| p = 0.2 | ||||||||
| Timsit et al (2002) [15], day 3 | 0.762 | U = 9.94 | LODS | 0.762 | H | |||
| p = 0.27 | ||||||||
| Timsit et al (2002) [15], day 4 | 0.766 | U = 10.5 | LODS | 0.766 | H | |||
| p = 0.23 | ||||||||
| Timsit et al (2002) [15], day 5 | 0.746 | U = 13.6 | LODS | 0.746 | H | |||
| p = 0.09 | ||||||||
| Pettilä et al (2002) [17], day 5 | 0.727 | LODS | 0.76 | H | ||||
| H | MODS | 0.744 | ||||||
| Timsit et al (2002) [15], day 6 | 0.763 | U = 12.2 | LODS | 0.763 | H | |||
| p = 0.14 | ||||||||
| Timsit et al (2002) [15], day 7 | 0.746 | LODS | 0.764 | H | ||||
| Bota et al (2002) [16], final | 0.897 | MODS | 0.869 | H | ||||
APACHE = Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation, APS = Acute Physiology Score (APACHE without chronic health and age condition), AUC = Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve, H = Hospital, H/C = H- or C- Hosmer-Lemeshow statistics, I = Intensive care unit, LODS = Logistic Organ Dysfunction System, MODS = Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score, Mort. = Mortality, RPHICU = Royal Perth Hospital Intensive Care Unit, SAPS = Simplified Acute Physiology Score, SOFA = Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, U = Unspecified (mortality type or H/C statistic).