Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Feb 23.
Published in final edited form as: Biotechnol Bioeng. 2008 Aug 15;100(6):1178–1192. doi: 10.1002/bit.21853

Table II.

Summary of metabolic activities of SEAP-producing CHO cells under different culture conditions

Culture conditionsa qGlC (μmol/106 cells/h) qLac (μmol/106 cells/h) YLac/Glc (mol/mol) qGln (nmol/106 cells/h) qAmm (nmol/106 cells/h) YAmm/Gln (mol/mol) Lactate concentration at harvest (mM) Ammonia concentration at harvest (mM)
Suspension 0.21±0.02 0.35±0.04 1.67±0.03 31.5±4.1 34.1±3.7 1.08±0.03 22 2.0
Microcarrier (Cytodex 3) 0.59±0.06 1.12±0.13 1.90±0.03 59.5±5.7 59.9±11.2 1.01±0.09 68 2.0
+181%b +220% +14% +88% +76% -6%
Microcarrier (Cytopore 1) 0.27±0.02 0.51±0.05 1.89±0.04 33.3±3.1 29.5±2.0 0.89±0.03 38 1.8
+29% +46% +13% +6% -13% -18%
Biphasic suspension culture Beforec Afterd Before After Before After Before After Before After Before After
0.28 0.12 0.51 0.17 1.8 1.4 18 1.2 17 1.4 0.9 1.2 57 1.8
+33% -43% 46% -51% +8% -16% -43% -96% -50% -96% -17% +11%
a

Values are mean of two independent experiments except biphasic suspension culture.

b

Percent change compared to single temperature suspension culture.

c

Before low temperature shift.

d

After low temperature shift.