Table 2.

Spatial (voxel) agreement using k criterion^a by diagnosis

	b SZ CLUST1	HC CLUST1	SZ MROI1	HC MROI1	SZ CLUST	HC CLUST
	SZ CLUST2	HC CLUST2	SZ MROI2	HC MROI2	SZ MROI	HC MROI
	(n=10)	(n=10)	(n=10)	(n=10)	c(n=10)	c(n=10)
L CB	0.88 ± 0.07	0.84 ± 0.10	0.69 ± 0.13	0.74 ± 0.08	0.76 ± 0.16	0.73 ± 0.13
R CB	0.88 ± 0.07	0.90 ± 0.04	0.79 ± 0.11	0.76 ± 0.12	0.81 ± 0.10	0.83 ± 0.12
Genu	0.89 ± 0.05	0.87 ± 0.05	0.80 ± 0.05	0.82 ± 0.09	0.80 ± 0.07	0.85 ± 0.06
L IFOF	0.73 ± 0.14	0.91 ± 0.11	0.86 ± 0.09	0.90 ± 0.10	0.81 ± 0.13	0.84 ± 0.09
R IFOF	0.80 ± 0.10	0.83 ± 0.15	0.85 ± 0.05	0.86 ± 0.08	0.76 ± 0.15	0.76 ± 0.10
L UF	0.82 ± 0.08	0.97 ± 0.08	0.85 ± 0.08	0.89 ± 0.07	0.75 ± 0.14	0.67 ± 0.11
R UF	0.94 ± 0.05	0.91 ± 0.07	0.90 ± 0.09	0.85 ± 0.06	0.70 ± 0.10	0.75 ± 0.09
L ILF	0.93 ± 0.09	0.82 ± 0.15	0.79 ± 0.08	0.80 ± 0.08	0.73 ± 0.08	0.70 ± 0.08
R ILF	0.96 ± 0.05	0.87 ± 0.10	0.74 ± 0.07	0.78 ± 0.05	0.71 ± 0.10	0.72 ± 0.07
L AF	0.78 ± 0.17	0.74 ± 0.12	0.70 ± 0.05	0.69 ± 0.07	0.68 ± 0.06	0.63 ± 0.10
R AF	0.79 ± 0.11	0.82 ± 0.06	0.77 ± 0.05	0.70 ± 0.10	0.71 ± 0.07	0.75 ± 0.10
L CST	0.86 ± 0.14	0.82 ± 0.15	0.75 ± 0.11	0.67 ± 0.08	0.69 ± 0.10	0.72 ± 0.08
R CST	0.70 ± 0.17	0.84 ± 0.13	0.76 ± 0.04	0.71 ± 0.07	0.70 ± 0.11	0.68 ± 0.10

^ak = 0.61–0.80 is considered ‘substantial agreement and k = 0.81–1.0 is considered ‘almost perfect’ agreement

^bInter rater reliability for each method calculated separately in schizophrenia (SZ) and healthy control (HC) groups

^cAveraged values for rater 1 and rater 2; intermethod reliability calculated separately for each rater initially for each subject, then averaged.