Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2008 Dec 29;45(2):370–376. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.028

Table 4.

Impact of Tract Segmentation Method on Diffusion Measures*

Region FA Trace Radial Diffusivity Axial Diffusivity
L CB 1.19 ± 1.2 0.49 ± 1.2 0.05 ± 0.3 0.03 ± 0.8
R CB 1.73 ± 2.3 0.67 ± 1.7 0.11 ± 0.4 0.21 ± 0.9
Genu 1.57 ± 1.8 0.25 ± 1.3 0.49 ± 0.7 0.48 ± 0.8
L IFOF 0.22 ± 1.6 0.84 ± 1.6 0.11 ± 0.4 0.76 ± 1.8
R IFOF 0.89 ± 1.4 0.36 ± 2.8 0.15 ± 0.7 0.88 ± 2.9
L UF 2.37 ± 2.3 1.22 ± 2.0 0.72 ± 0.5 1.87 ± 1.7
R UF 0.28 ± 1.3 0.87 ± 0.7 0.21 ± 0.4 0.62 ± 0.8
L ILF 1.72 ± 2.1 1.13 ± 2.7 0.69 ± 0.8 1.29 ± 1.3
R ILF 2.61 ± 2.9 1.20 ± 2.9 0.91 ± 0.9 1.65 ± 0.9
L AF 2.13 ± 2.4 0.50 ± 1.7 0.75 ± 1.3 1.07 ± 2.7
R AF 2.42 ± 1.8 0.68 ± 2.3 0.86 ± 1.7 0.97 ± 2.1
L CST 0.69 ± 1.7 0.03 ± 1.9 0.10 ± 0.4 0.08 ± 1.1
R CST 0.82 ± 1.9 1.80 ± 1.6 0.12 ± 0.6 0.29 ± 0.8

All regions** 1.43 ± 2.2 0.77± 1.9 0.41 ± 0.7 0.78 ± 1.3
*

Mean and SD of the percent difference between the clustering and MROI methods.

**

The value for ‘All regions’ is simply the mean of the all the regional means.