Table 4.

Visual Between-Group Results

Comparison	χ2 (df, N/n)	p-value	α	Significance	γ
First Approach
Omnibus	17.251 (3, 126)	0.001	0.05	*	−0.468
Control vs. E15-E16	10.352 (1, 63)	0.001	0.008	*	−0.692
E8-E9 vs. E15-E16	8.875 (1, 66)	0.003	0.01	*	−0.642
Control vs. E22-E23	8.042 (1, 60)	0.004	0.0125	*	−0.649
E8-E9 vs. E22-E23	6.567 (1, 63)	0.009	0.017	*	−0.594
Control vs. E8-E9	0.105 (1, 65)	0.745	0.025	NS	−0.090
E15-E16 vs. E22-E23	0.083 (1, 61)	0.773	0.05	NS	+0.077
Duration Preference Score
Omnibus	18.000 (3, 107)	0.000	0.05	*	−0.539
E8-E9 vs. E22-E23	12.726 (1, 52)	0.000	0.008	*	−0.800
Control vs. E22-E23	10.250 (1, 55)	0.001	0.01	*	−0.726
E8-E9 vs. E15-E16	7.971 (1, 52)	0.005	0.0125	*	−0.705
Control vs. E15-E16	5.867 (1, 55)	0.015	0.017	*	−0.603
E15-E16 vs. E22-E23	0.666 (1, 56)	0.415	0.025	NS	−0.219
Control vs. E8-E9	0.251 (1, 51)	0.617	0.05	NS	+0.176
No Preference Comparisons
Omnibus	7.765 (3, 120)	0.051	0.05	NS	+0.106