Skip to main content
. 2008 Jan 22;86(3):221–228. doi: 10.2471/BLT.06.039495

Table 3. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of base case and one-way sensitivity analyses (baseline to round 4).

Item ICER (US$)a,b
Per 1% change in HC mean score
Wages, benefits and per diem
⁃ high (90 403.90) 4 047
⁃ base (56 192.23) 3 091
⁃ low (23 886.20) 2 188
Transportation, vehicle and accommodation
⁃ high (56 873.35) 3 268
⁃ base (50 549.95) 3 091
⁃ low (38 305.28) 2 749
Training
⁃ high (3 957.90) 3 106
⁃ base (3 402.60) 3 091
⁃ low (2 638.80) 3 070
Discount rate
⁃ costs discounted at 5% 3 040
⁃ base at 0% 3 091
⁃ costs discounted at 3% 3 060
Per 1% change in immunization session mean score
Wages, benefits and per diem
⁃ high (90 403.90) 16 706
⁃ base (56 192.23) 12 760
⁃ low (23 886.20) 9 034
Transportation, vehicle and accommodation
⁃ high (56 873.35) 13 489
⁃ base (50 549.95) 12 760
⁃ low (38 305.28) 11 348
Training
⁃ high (3 957.90) 12 824
⁃ base (3 402.60) 12 760
⁃ low (2 638.80) 12 672
Discount rate
⁃ costs discounted at 5% 12 548
⁃ base at 0% 12 760
⁃ costs discounted at 3% 12 630

HC, health centre.
a US$ values are year 2000 prices.
b Cost-effectiveness ratios between each round are available from authors upon request.