Skip to main content
. 2008 May;86(5):390–398. doi: 10.2471/BLT.07.044529

Table 3. Pooled odds ratios from meta-analysis of all studies and sensitivity analyses.

Group Detail Estimates including low exposure prevalence studies
Estimates excluding low exposure prevalence studies
N OR 95% CI N OR 95% CI
All studies 27 1.78 1.45–2.18 23 1.93 1.54–2.42
26 1.67a 1.39–2.01 22 1.79a 1.46–2.21
Study design Randomized control trial (one study) 2 1.28 1.06–1.54 No studies with low prevalence
Cohort 7 2.12 1.05–4.25 No studies with low prevalence
All case–control 15 1.97 1.47–2.64 11 2.38 1.90–2.97
Case–control with good control selection (9) 1.50 1.05–2.14 (5) 2.17 1.07–4.41
Cross sectional 3 1.49 1.21–1.85 No studies with low prevalence
Confounding Adequate or good adjustmenta 16 1.77 1.43–2.18 14 1.80 1.43–2.25
Exposure Good categorizationa 16 1.67 1.33–2.09 14 1.73 1.35–2.20
Solid versus clean fuela 14 1.69 1.29–2.20 12 1.76 1.32–2.36
Outcome Excluding DHSa 23 1.72 1.37–2.17 19 1.89 1.44–2.48
measure Used physician diagnosis or more specific 20 1.65 1.26–2.15 16 1.83 1.31–2.55
15 1.97b 1.44–2.70
Age group < 60 months 11 1.62 1.21–2.15 10 1.67 1.22–2.30
< 36 months 4 2.05 1.38–3.07 3 2.17 1.37–3.43
< 24 monthsa 12 1.96 1.36–2.82 9 1.85 1.27–2.69

CI, confidence interval; DHS, Demographic and Health Surveys; OR, odds ratio.
a Exclusion of Group II in study by Pandey et al.32 (this study was of children < 24 months of age, so only required exclusion in the youngest group in the age sensitivity analyses).
b Exclusion of study by Jin et al.35