Skip to main content
. 2008 Dec 3;89(1):265–276. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2008.26077

TABLE 4.

Erythrocyte fatty acid concentrations among women in Shanghai, China, and risk of proliferative fibrocystic conditions (PFCs) with or without breast cancer (BC)1

Quartiles of erythrocyte fatty acid concentrations
1 2 3 4 P for trend
% of total by wt
Palmitic acid (16:0) 0 < n ≤ 18.16 18.16 < n ≤ 18.70 18.70 < n ≤ 19.27 19.27 < n
 PFCs vs control 1.00 0.94 (0.44, 2.03)2 0.67 (0.32, 1.47) 1.16 (0.55, 2.42) 0.64
 PFCs with BC vs control 1.00 0.52 (0.21, 1.30) 0.66 (0.28, 1.52) 1.19 (0.53, 2.64) 0.13
 PFCs with BC vs PFCs alone3 1.00 0.57 (0.23, 1.45) 0.77 (0.32, 1.87) 0.87 (0.38, 1.98) 0.75
 All BCs vs PFCs alone 1.00 0.66 (0.31, 1.41) 1.02 (0.49, 2.08) 1.14 (0.58, 2.25) 0.22
Palmitoleic acid (16:1n–7) 0 < n ≤ 0.13 0.13 < n ≤ 0.17 0.17 < n ≤ 0.24 0.24 < n
 PFCs alone vs control 1.00 1.91 (1.03, 3.55) 2.87 (1.50, 5.50) 2.87 (1.42, 5.80) 0.001
 PFCs with BC vs control 1.00 3.93 (1.63, 9.48) 8.76 (3.65, 21.0) 8.13 (3.21, 20.6) <0.0001
 PFCs with BC vs PFCs alone3 1.00 2.62 (0.64, 4.12) 2.55 (1.02, 6.35) 1.97 (0.74, 5.24) 0.12
 All BCs vs PFCs alone 1.00 1.09 (0.55, 2.17) 1.76 (0.90, 3.44) 1.72 (0.84, 3.53) 0.04
Oleic acid (18:1n–9c) 0 < n ≤ 9.81 9.81 < n ≤ 10.38 10.38< n ≤ 11.02 11.02 < n
 PFCs alone vs control 1.00 1.01 (0.58, 1.76) 0.82 (0.46, 1.50) 1.67 (0.82, 3.42) 0.46
 PFCs with BC vs control 1.00 1.06 (0.59, 1.89) 0.69 (0.35, 1.37) 1.24 (0.60, 2.56) 0.98
 PFCs with BC vs PFCs alone3 1.00 1.12 (0.59, 2.11) 0.86 (0.42, 1.78) 1.00 (0.46, 2.21) 0.85
 All BCs vs PFCs alone 1.00 1.01 (0.60, 1.70) 1.06 (0.60, 1.88) 0.99 (0.52, 1.90) 0.94
Vaccenic acid (18:1n–7) 0 < n ≤ 0.85 0.85 < n ≤ 0.93 0.93 < n ≤ 1.01 1.01 < n
 PFCs alone vs control 1.00 1.40 (0.78, 2.48) 1.22 (0.65, 2.29) 1.09 (0.56, 2.14) 0.86
 PFCs with BC vs control 1.00 1.14 (0.61, 2.14) 1.16 (0.61, 2.20) 1.09 (0.54, 2.20) 0.76
 PFCs with BC vs PFCs alone3 1.00 0.66 (0.33, 1.33) 0.98 (0.48, 2.00) 0.87 (0.39, 1.93) 0.97
 All BCs vs PFCs alone 1.00 0.85 (0.48, 1.52) 1.32 (0.73, 2.38) 1.24 (0.65, 2.37) 0.24
n−6 PUFAs4 0 < n ≤ 26.61 26.61 < n ≤ 27.76 27.76 < n ≤ 29.48 29.48 < n
 PFCs alone vs control 1.00 0.73 (0.42, 1.28) 0.66 (0.37, 1.20) 0.80 (0.40, 1.59) 0.31
 PFCs with BC vs control 1.00 0.91 (0.49, 1.69) 1.17 (0.62, 2.19) 1.35 (0.62, 2.95) 0.38
 PFCs with BC vs PFCs alone3 1.00 1.35 (0.67, 2.71) 2.21 (1.11, 4.44) 1.99 (0.88, 4.46) 0.03
 All BCs vs PFCs alone 1.00 1.31 (0.76, 2.25) 1.51 (0.86, 2.67) 1.88 (0.99, 3.57) 0.04
Linoleic acid (18:2) 0 < n ≤ 10.19 10.19 < n ≤ 11.40 11.40 < n ≤ 13.63 13.63 < n
 PFCs alone vs control 1.00 0.70 (0.40, 1.24) 0.60 (0.33, 1.11) 0.88 (0.43, 1.78) 0.40
 PFCs with BC vs control 1.00 0.50 (0.27, 0.92) 0.47 (0.25, 0.91) 0.73 (0.33, 1.61) 0.13
 PFCs with BC vs PFCs alone3 1.00 0.83 (0.43, 1.60) 0.84 (0.40, 1.76) 0.92 (0.42, 2.02) 0.75
 All BCs vs PFCs alone 1.00 1.05 (0.62, 1.80) 1.04 (0.58, 1.89) 1.17 (0.62, 2.19) 0.67
γ-Linolenic acid (18:3n–6) 0 < n ≤ 0.05 0.05 < n ≤ 0.07 0.07 < n ≤ 0.09 0.09 < n
 PFCs alone vs control 1.00 0.68 (0.40, 1.15) 1.17 (0.59, 2.31) 1.03 (0.52, 2.04) 0.72
 PFCs with BC vs control 1.00 1.15 (0.61, 2.16) 2.57 (1.24, 5.32) 2.54 (1.19, 5.42) 0.003
 PFCs with BC vs PFCs alone3 1.00 1.74 (0.88, 3.42) 2.28 (1.04, 5.01) 2.50 (1.13, 5.57) 0.02
 All BCs vs PFCs alone 1.00 1.32 (0.78, 2.26) 1.59 (0.85, 3.00) 2.23 (1.22, 4.07) 0.008
Arachidonic acid (20:4) 0 < n ≤ 11.43 11.43 < n ≤ 12.17 12.17 < n ≤ 12.92 12.92 < n
 PFCs alone vs control 1.00 0.93 (0.51, 1.68) 0.77 (0.41, 1.47) 0.86 (0.45, 1.62) 0.54
 PFCs with BC vs control 1.00 0.74 (0.36, 1.53) 1.72 (0.88, 3.38) 1.11 (0.56, 2.18) 0.33
 PFCs with BC vs PFCs alone3 1.00 0.78 (0.36, 1.70) 1.84 (0.87, 3.88) 1.41 (0.67, 3.00) 0.11
 All BCs vs PFCs alone 1.00 0.63 (0.35, 1.13) 1.35 (0.75, 2.43) 0.93 (0.51, 1.69) 0.53
n−3 PUFAs5 0 < n ≤ 7.05 7.05 < n ≤ 7.64 7.64 < n ≤ 8.36 8.36 < n
 PFCs alone vs control 1.00 0.61 (0.31, 1.20) 0.92 (0.49, 1.72) 1.04 (0.57, 1.92) 0.57
 PFCs with BC vs control 1.00 0.73 (0.36, 1.46) 0.83 (0.43, 1.59) 0.61 (0.31, 1.20) 0.22
 PFCs with BC vs PFCs alone3 1.00 1.51 (0.70, 3.26) 1.19 (0.59, 2.42) 0.76 (0.37, 1.59) 0.37
 All BCs vs PFCs alone 1.00 1.01 (0.55, 1.87) 0.84 (0.47, 1.48) 0.57 (0.32, 1.00) 0.04
Eicosapentaenoic acid (20:5) 0 < n ≤ 0.46 0.46 < n ≤ 0.56 0.56 < n ≤ 0.69 0.69 < n
 PFCs alone vs control 1.00 0.74 (0.90, 0.47) 1.23 (0.68, 2.21) 0.93 (0.50, 1.74) 0.91
 PFCs with BC vs control 1.00 1.29 (0.68, 2.43) 0.74 (0.39, 1.42) 0.79 (0.40, 1.55) 0.25
 PFCs with BC vs PFCs alone3 1.00 1.32 (0.65, 2.67) 0.50 (0.24, 1.05) 0.78 (0.37, 1.65) 0.15
 All BCs vs PFCs alone 1.00 1.15 (0.65, 2.04) 0.48 (0.27, 0.85) 0.51 (0.27, 0.94) 0.003
Docosapentaenoic acid (22:5) 0 < n ≤ 1.62 1.62 < n ≤ 1.85 1.85 < n ≤ 2.09 2.09 < n
 PFCs alone vs control 1.00 0.86 (0.45, 1.63) 0.99 (0.51, 1.93) 1.00 (0.50, 1.98) 0.87
 PFCs with BC vs control 1.00 0.63 (0.30, 1.30) 1.05 (0.51, 2.15) 0.57 (0.27, 1.23) 0.35
 PFCs with BC vs PFC alone3 1.00 0.65 (0.31, 1.38) 1.01 (0.49, 2.10) 0.79 (0.37, 1.71) 0.88
 All BCs vs PFCs alone 1.00 0.65 (0.36, 1.17) 0.87 (0.48, 1.57) 0.57 (0.30, 1.08) 0.20
Docosahexaenoic acid (22:6) 0 < n ≤ 4.40 4.40 < n ≤ 4.90 4.90 < n ≤ 5.46 5.46 < n
 PFCs alone vs control 1.00 0.82 (0.41, 1.63) 0.77 (0.40, 1.49) 1.33 (0.72, 2.45) 0.29
% of total by wt
 PFCs with BC vs control 1.00 0.80 (0.40, 1.58) 0.68 (0.35, 1.32) 0.81 (0.43, 1.53) 0.47
 PFCs with BC vs PFCs alone3 1.00 1.05 (0.48, 2.31) 0.96 (0.46, 2.04) 0.72 (0.35, 1.48) 0.32
 All BCs vs PFCs alone 1.00 0.86 (0.46, 1.63) 0.84 (0.46, 1.54) 0.58 (0.33, 1.01) 0.06
1

PUFAs, polyunsaturated fatty acids. Models were stratified by year of interview (1995–1996, 1998–1999, and 2000–2001) and adjusted for age by conditional logistic regression analysis. Number of subjects in age-adjusted model: 185 with PFCs, 114 with NPFCs and BC, and 1030 control subjects.

2

Odds ratio and 95% CI (all such values).

3

Adjusted for age and number of induced abortions, stratified by year of interview.

4

18:2n–6cc + 18:3n–6 + 20:2n–6 + 20:3n–6 + 20:4n–6 + 22:2n–6 + 22:4n–6.

5

18:3n–3 + 20:3n–3 + 20:5n–3 + 22:5n–3 + 22:6n–3.