Skip to main content
. 2009 Mar 1;32(3):351–360. doi: 10.1093/sleep/32.3.351

Table 3.

Next-Day Residual Measures

Baseline Week 1 Month 1 Month 3 Month 5 Month 6 Placebo Run-out
Morning alertness
    Placebo 4.09 3.88 3.90 3.75 3.80 3.70 3.67
    Ramelteon 4.12 4.00 3.86 3.79 3.79 3.78 3.67
Ability to concentrate
    Placebo 4.10 3.89 3.96 3.79 3.85 3.75 3.67
    Ramelteon 4.15 3.95 3.83 3.73 3.77 3.79 3.67
DSST
    Placebo 36.00 38.31 40.51 38.36 40.27 41.72 41.49
    Ramelteon 35.27 38.08 40.48 39.29 40.77 41.53 42.27
Immediate memory recall
    Placebo 6.78 8.13 7.60 8.98 8.81 8.46 8.43
    Ramelteon 6.89 8.11 7.50 9.12 8.67 8.36 8.09
Delayed memory recall
    Placebo 4.87 6.44 6.30 7.79 7.45 7.42 6.95
    Ramelteon 5.04 6.41 6.32 7.92 7.46 7.24 6.52
VAS for feelings – energetic/fatigued
    Placebo 47.99 42.53 41.77 40.72 39.08 39.22 38.14
    Ramelteon 47.83 44.67 42.66 39.45 40.93 43.26a 42.22a
VAS for mood - drowsy
    Placebo 36.06 31.11 30.22 29.61 30.62 28.65 27.76
    Ramelteon 35.22 34.46a 31.96 29.69 30.24 30.69 28.86
VAS for mood – slowed down
    Placebo 34.43 30.12 28.87 29.11 29.28 28.11 26.25
    Ramelteon 33.85 33.27a 30.87 28.78 29.88 30.41 28.42
VAS for mood - sleepy
    Placebo 37.86 33.17 31.78 30.41 31.23 30.12 28.62
    Ramelteon 37.68 36.42a 33.08 31.12 31.58 31.94 29.48
VAS for feelings – thinking slowed down/speeded up
    Placebo 39.08 39.91 38.88 39.25 39.28 40.90 40.79
    Ramelteon 39.31 38.39 40.59 40.58 39.46 37.34a 37.94

Data are reported as least-square mean. The number of subjects was 224 in the Placebo group and 227 in the Ramelteon group. The number for each time point may be slightly less in either group due to available data. DSST refers to Digit Symbol Substitution Test.

Subjective morning alertness and ability to concentrate are evaluated on a 7-point scale in which 1 = excellent and 7 = extremely poor. Visual analog scale (VAS) for Feelings: 0 = energetic, 100 = fatigued; VAS for Mood: 0 = a little, 100 = a lot;

a

P < 0.05 vs placebo (obtained using t-tests from the analysis of covariance model of the overall treatment comparison).