Table 1.
Review of clinical studies.
| Authors | n (number of patients) | Conclusions and limitations |
|---|---|---|
| Montorsi et al. (1997) | 30 | Alprostadil injections led to superior rate of return of adequate erections; no preoperative EF parameters, no questionnaire, small number of patients, short follow-up |
|
| ||
| Mulhall et al. (2005) | 132 | Pharmacologic penile rehabilitation protocol results in higher rates of spontaneous erections and erectogenic drug response; no placebo arm, strong patient selection bias, dropouts were not included |
|
| ||
| Montorsi et al. (2006) | 80 | No significant difference is IIEF scores of patients using on demand versus daily PDE5 inhibitors post-NSRRP; compliance not reported |
|
| ||
| Bannowsky et al. (2008) | 43 | Daily low-dose sildenafil leads to improved recovery of EF post-NSRRP (86% versus 66% placebo); small number of patients, not placebo-controlled, single center, only included patients who showed preserved EF post-operative with Rigiscan testing |
|
| ||
| Padma-Nathan et al. (2008) | 76 | First placebo-controlled trial suggesting benefit of daily PDE5 inhibitor use: nightly sildenafil increased return of spontaneous erections; low percentage (4%) considered responders in placebo arm, but strict definition of responders |
|
| ||
| McCullough et al. (2008) | 54 | Nightly sildenafil improved nocturnal erections versus placebo; nocturnal tumescence data do not necessarily correlate with clinically usable erections |
|
| ||
| Montorsi et al. (2008) | 628 | Nightly vardenafil did not have any effect beyond that of on demand use |