Skip to main content
. 2006 Jul 6;174(7):803–809. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200604-488OC

TABLE 2.

UNIVARIATE SURVIVAL MODELS EXPLORING SERIAL CHANGES IN WALK DISTANCE, DESATURATION AREA, FVC, AND DLCO WHEN ADJUSTING FOR BASELINE VALUES

n Hazard Ratio (95% CI) p Value
Patients with baseline SaO2 > 88%
 Baseline walk distance 68 0.89 (0.78–1.02) 0.094
 Decrease in WD > 200 ft 17 4.81 (1.75–13.19) 0.002
 Increase in WD or decrease < 200 ft 51 1.00 REF
 Baseline DA, 10 U 70 1.73 (1.17–2.54) 0.006
 DA relative change 70 3.47 (1.667.25) 0.001
 Baseline FVC, % predicted 86 0.41 (0.04–3.83) 0.435
 Decrease in FVC (% predicted) relative change > 10% 20 3.57 (1.57–8.10) 0.002
 Increase in FVC (% predicted) relative change or decrease < 10% 66 1.00 REF
 Baseline DlCO, % predicted 70 0.19 (0.01–2.90) 0.233
 Decrease in DlCO (% predicted) relative change > 15% 10 3.73 (1.44–9.65) 0.007
 Increase in DlCO (% predicted) relative change or decrease < 15% 60 1.00 REF
Patients with baseline SaO2 ⩽ 88%
 Baseline walk distance 48 0.95 (0.84–1.08) 0.443
 Decrease in WD > 200 ft 16 2.25 (0.85–5.95) 0.103
 Increase in WD or decrease < 200 ft 32 1.00 REF
 Baseline DA, 10 U 57 0.83 (0.43–1.60) 0.583
 DA relative change 57 0.53 (0.06–4.78) 0.590
 Baseline FVC, % predicted 74 0.54 (0.07–4.38) 0.564
 Decrease in FVC (% predicted) relative change > 10% 18 1.66 (0.76–3.64) 0.208
 Increase in FVC (% predicted) relative change or decrease < 10% 56 1.00 REF
 Baseline DlCO, % predicted 61 0.32 (0.01–10.05) 0.514
 Decrease in DlCO (% predicted) relative change > 15% 14 3.23 (1.41–7.37) 0.006
 Increase in DlCO (% predicted) relative change or decrease < 15% 47 1.00 REF

Definition of abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; DA = desaturation area; REF = reference group; WD = walk distance.