Skip to main content
. 2006 Aug 31;174(11):1221–1228. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200604-519OC

TABLE 5.

ODDS RATIOS FOR SYMPTOMS AMONG THOSE WITH AND WITHOUT PREVENTIVE ACTIONS AND WITH NO REPORTED SMOKE EXPOSURE (REFERENT GROUP), 1–5, OR ⩾ 6 DAYS OF FIRE SMOKE SMELL INDOORS

Use of Mask
Air Conditioner Use
Less Outdoors
No Yes No Yes No Yes
Symptom Exposure Level OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
Sneezing or runny/blocked nose, n 3,673 396 3,158 911 1,371 2,698
No fire smell (referent) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1–5 d fire smell 2.01 (1.70−2.39) 1.58 (0.86–2.91) 2.14 (1.77–2.59) 1.75 (1.26–2.43) 1.84 (1.25–2.73) 1.76 (1.46–2.11)
6 or more days fire smell 2.81 (2.27−3.47) 2.30 (1.22–4.31) 3.05 (2.42–3.85) 2.23 (1.52–3.25) 2.54 (1.60–4.01) 2.47 (1.98–3.09)
Wheezing, n 3,630 387 3,111 906 1,357 2,660
No fire smell (referent) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1–5 d fire smell 2.05 (1.51−2.79) 1.50 (0.68–3.31) 2.29 (1.64–3.18) 1.79 (1.79–3.07) 4.80 (2.51–9.20) 1.76 (1.28–2.42)
6 or more days fire smell 3.47 (2.49−4.85) 2.23 (1.52–3.25) 3.46 (2.41–4.98) 3.00 (1.71–5.27) 7.65 (3.74–15.63) 2.91 (2.06–4.09)

For definition of abbreviations, see Table 4.

Total n varies between 4,017 and 4,069 due to varying number of “don't know” answers). The interactions of fire smell and preventive actions were statistically significant (likelihood ratio test, p < 0.05) for mask and air conditioner use in case of sneezing/blocked nose, and for “less outdoors” in case of wheezing. Note that in each exposure category, those taking preventive action had higher symptom rates than those not taking action (see text).