Table 4.
sample | A1 | τw (ps) | A2 | τl (ps) |
---|---|---|---|---|
x = 2 | 0.03 | 0.3 | 0.35 | ∞* |
x = 4 | 0.06 | 0.3 | 0.33 | 70* |
x = 6 | 0.07 | 0.4 | 0.32 | 30* |
x = 8 | 0.07 | 0.4 | 0.32 | 11 |
x = 16 | 0.05 | 0.4 | 0.32 | 5 |
bulk water | 0.36 | 2.6 |
These values are so long compared to the time range over which they are measured that they should be taken to be very approximate. From the data and the fits, it is clear that x = 6 is slower than x = 8, and that x = 4 is slower still. For x = 2, following the initial fast decay, the data are horizontal within experimental error.