Skip to main content
. 2009 Mar 6;284(10):6379–6388. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M808161200

TABLE 3.

Kinetic parameters for single dNTP incorporation opposite template 26-mer-dGAP

dNTP Kd, dNTP kp (kp/Kd, dNTP)damaged Efficiency ratioa,b Fidelityc Probabilityd
μm s–1 μm–1 s–1
19/26-mer-dGAP
   dGTP 187 ± 36 4.3 ± 0.3 2.3 × 10–2 1.1 99.8
   dATP 373 ± 81 (6.3 ± 0.5) × 10–3 1.7 × 10–5 0.8 7.4 × 10–5 0.1
   dCTP 227 ± 23 (6.4 ± 0.2) × 10–3 2.8 × 10–5 5 1.2 × 10–3 0.1
   dTTP 1180 ± 190 (1.0 ± 0.1) × 10–2 8.7 × 10–6 1.0 3.8 × 10–4 0.0
20/26-mer-dGAPe
   dCTP 167 ± 15 1.03 ± 0.03 6.2 × 10–3 9.2 98.4
   dATP 856 ± 184 (7.6 ± 0.8) × 10–2 8.9 × 10–5 0.2 1.4 × 10–2 1.4
   dGTP 955 ± 160 (2.0 ± 0.2) × 10–3 2.1 × 10–6 21 3.3 × 10–4 0.0
   dTTP 557 ± 36 (5.5 ± 0.1) × 10–3 9.9 × 10–6 8.4 1.6 × 10–3 0.2
21/26-mer-dGAPe
   dGTP 674 ± 231 (2.8 ± 0.3) × 10–2 4.2 × 10–5 88 88.6
   dATP 886 ± 145 (2.7 ± 0.2) × 10–3 3.1 × 10–6 0.8 6.8 × 10–2 6.5
   dCTP 328 ± 79 (6.8 ± 0.5) × 10–4 2.1 × 10–6 15 4.7 × 10–2 4.4
   dTTP 2300 ± 461 (4.9 ± 0.7) × 10–4 2.2 × 10–7 8.2 5.1 × 10–3 0.5
22/26-mer-dGAP
   dCTP 682 ± 80 6.3 ± 0.3 9.3 × 10–3 3.7 99.8
   dATP 826 ± 85 (4.2 ± 0.2) × 10–3 5.0 × 10–6 0.8 5.4 × 10–4 0.1
   dGTP 502 ± 98 (4.3 ± 0.3) × 10–3 8.6 × 10–6 0.8 9.3 × 10–4 0.1
   dTTP 1540 ± 257 (4.7 ± 0.5) × 10–3 3.1 × 10–6 3.6 3.3 × 10–4 0.0
23/26-mer-dGAP
   dGTP 62 ± 18 1.9 ± 0.1 3.1 × 10–2 0.8 98.9
   dATP 668 ± 173 (3.7 ± 0.4) × 10–2 5.5 × 10–5 0.3 1.8 × 10–3 0.2
   dCTP 1130 ± 161 (9.0 ± 0.7) × 10–3 7.9 × 10–6 0.2 2.6 × 10–4 0.0
   dTTP 1290 ± 218 (3.4 ± 0.3) × 10–2 2.7 × 10–4 0.01 8.7 × 10–4 0.9
a

Calculated as (kp/Kd, dNTP)control/(kp/Kd, dNTP)damaged

b

Values for (kp/Kd, dNTP)control are listed in supplemental Table 1

c

Calculated as (kp/Kd, incorrect dNTP)damaged/(kp/Kd, correct dNTP)damaged + (kp/ Kd, incorrect dNTP)damaged

d

Calculated as ((kp/Kd, dNTP)damaged/(Σ(kp/Kd, dNTP)damaged)) × 100

e

Denotes pause sites