Skip to main content
. 2009 Mar 6;284(10):6476–6485. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M806599200

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1.

Structural effects of mutations designed to test the hypothesis that Cys106-sulfinic acid formation is critical to DJ-1 function. A, a ribbon representation of the DJ-1 dimer, with one monomer in brown and the other in green. The dimer 2-fold axis is perpendicular to the page and indicated by an ellipse. The oxidationprone cysteine (C106) and the interacting glutamic acid (E18) are represented in each monomer. B, electron density for the 1.15 Å resolution structure of E18Q DJ-1 around Cys106 is shown at the 1σ contour level and calculated with σA weighted coefficients 2mFo - DFc. In E18Q DJ-1, Cys106 is oxidized to the cysteine-sulfinic acid, where stabilizing hydrogen bonds are shown as dotted lines with distances given in Å. C, a superposition of oxidized E18Q (darker model) and wild-type DJ-1 (lighter model) shows that the key stabilizing hydrogen bond between residue 18 and Cys106-Inline graphic is lengthened in E18Q DJ-1, weakening this interaction. D, 2mFo - DFc electron density contoured at 1σ is shown in blue for the 1.20 Å resolution crystal structure of E18D DJ-1. Cys106 is oxidized to the easily reduced Cys106-SO- oxidation product in this variant. In addition, there is minor electron density that is consistent with either Cys106-Inline graphic or an alternate conformation for Cys106-SO-. E, a superposition of residues in the vicinity of Cys106 in E18D DJ-1 (darker model) and the corresponding region in oxidized wild-type DJ-1 (lighter model). The E18D substitution results in structural perturbations at Cys106 that stabilize the Cys106-SO- oxidation product and hinder further oxidation. All figures were created using POVscript+ (40).