Skip to main content
. 2009 Mar-Apr;16(2):267–270. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2835

Table 2.

Table 2 Comparison of Mean (Standard Deviation) Clinician Survey Responses of Portal Mail Non-Users and Users

Survey Item Mean Portal Mail Non-Users (N = 21) Mean Portal Mail Users (N = 12)
I have adequate means of communicating with my patients. 3.6 (±1.1) 3.7 (±1.0)
I have sufficient time during office hours to return phone messages 2.2 (±1.2) 1.8 (±0.8)
In communicating with patients by all means available to me, I am able to respond to their concerns within 24 h. 2.3 (±1.1) 2.5 (±1.2)
In communicating with patients by all means available to me, I am able to respond to their concerns within 48 h. 3.3 (±1.1) 3.3 (±0.9)
I am satisfied with the current means available to me to communicate with patients: 3.1 (±1.2) 2.9 (±1.0)
Telephone calls are an efficient means to communicate with patients outside of office visits: 3.8 (±0.7) 2.6 (±1.0)
Written letters to patients are an efficient means to communicate with patients outside of office visits: 3.5 (±1.1) 3.8 (±0.6)
Patients have adequate means to contact me outside of office visits: 3.8 (±0.8) 3.2 (±0.7)
Using currently available means of communication, I reliably receive messages from patients: 3.8 (±0.8) 3.4 (±0.7)
Patients have adequate means available to communicate with staff to complete administrative tasks such as medication refills and appointments: 3.6 (±0.9) 2.9 (±0.8)
Using portal mail to communicate with patients increases workload: 3.7 (±0.9) 2.7 (±1.2)
Adding portal mail to my current software used to care for patients is manageable: 2.4 (±1.0) 4.0 (±0.9)
I have adequate assistance from clinic staff to communicate with patients: 3.1 (±1.2) 2.8 (±1.1)
I am able to effectively and efficiently use the software available to me for clinical care (i.e., CPRS, vista imaging, care management): 4.0 (±0.6) 4.3 (±0.5)