Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Early Hum Dev. 2008 Sep 11;85(2):117–124. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2008.07.001

Table 3.

Effect sizes for the sex differences in various ratios of length of the metacarpals (top) and metatarsals (bottom) of African-Americans aged 18–39 at death.

Effect Size (F minus M)
Ratio Number F/M Left Right
Hands
1Mc:2Mc 52/64 −0.209 −0.307
1Mc:3Mc 53/64 −0.034 −0.110
1Mc:4Mc 53/64 −0.104 −0.226
1Mc:5Mc 54/63 −0.068 −0.222
2Mc:3Mc 52/65 0.271 0.275
2Mc:4Mc 52/65 0.186 0.090
2Mc:5Mc 53/64 0.171 0.115
3Mc:4Mc 53/65 −0.033 −0.169
3Mc:5Mc 54/64 −0.019 −0.128
4Mc:5Mc 54/64 0.012 −0.008
Feet
1Mt:2Mt 53/62 0.294 0.180
1Mt:3Mt 54/62 0.305 0.161
1Mt:4Mt 54/61 0.139 0.145
1Mt:5Mt 53/61 0.248 0.132
2Mt:3Mt 54/62 0.042 −0.026
2Mt:4Mt 54/61 −0.165 −0.023
2Mt:5Mt 53/61 0.025 0.018
3Mt:4Mt 55/61 −0.281 0.001
3Mt:5Mt 54/61 0.023 0.047
4Mt:5Mt 54/60 0.193 0.053

Mc = metacarpal

Mt = metatarsal

F = Female

M = Male

Results from unpaired t tests, two-tailed:

*

= 0.05 > p > 0.01;

**

= 0.01 > p > 0.001