Table 4. Hypotheses Tested A. actinomycetemcomitans rat feeding model.
| Ability of microbe delivered via oral feeding to induce an infection. | (Fine, et al., 2001) (Schreiner, et al., 2003) |
| Ability of microbe to attach, colonize, and integrate into an established (albeit reduced) oral flora. | (Fine, et al., 2001) (Schreiner, et al., 2003) |
| Recovery of microbe from animal and analysis of traits unique to its growth in that animal as compared to growth seen in laboratory cultures of same organism. | (Fine, et al., 2001) (Schreiner, et al., 2003) |
| Microbial attachment factors essential for colonization of animal tooth and tissue Can be analyzed | (Schreiner, et al., 2003) (Sharma, et al., 2001) |
| Microbial attachment and colonization can be related to antibody response and bone loss. | (Burckhardt & Guggenheim, 1980 (Schreiner, et al., 2003; Sharma, et al., 2001) |
| Analysis of effect of antagonistic or symbiotic organisms on growth and survival of test microbe | (Hillman, et al., 2000) |
| Potential and Future Uses of This Model | |
| To investigate how mutants in known A.a virulence traits (i.e. leukotoxin, cytolethal distending toxin) effect colonization, antibody responses and bone loss. | |
| To identify relationship between specific and non-specific adhesions on attachment and colonization. | |
| To determine how different strains of A.a and other “pathogens” colonize in the rat feeding model. | |
| To determine how different strains of rats are affected by A.a colonization; which strains are more susceptible to colonization; does colonization correlate to antibody response and bone loss. | |
| To determine the immunopathological response in animals colonized by A.a in different rat species |