. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Mar 2.

Published in final edited form as: J Refract Surg. 2009 Feb;25(2):185–194. doi: 10.3928/1081597x-20090201-03

TABLE 2.

Results of the Linear Regression Analysis in 40 Eyes That Underwent Artemis 1 Very High-frequency Digital Ultrasound Arc Scanning

Variable/Predictors	Mean Difference (mm) (Predictor - Variable) (P Value)	Correlation Significance (P Value)	Pearson’s r²	95% Confidence Interval of the Residuals (mm)
Angle diameter/White-to-white	−0.92±0.28 (<.001)	<.001	0.587	±0.53
Angle diameter/
White-to-white		<.001	0.691	±0.46
Central corneal thickness		.007
Minimum keratometry		.009
Sulcus diameter/White-to-white	−0.89±0.57 (<.001)	<.001	0.323	±1.11
Sulcus diameter/Angle diameter	−0.02±0.51 (<.128)	<.001	0.458	±0.99
Sulcus diameter/
Angle diameter		<.001	0.571	±0.88
Anterior chamber depth		.003