Skip to main content
. 2009 Mar;8(3):547–557. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M700558-MCP200

Table II.

Performance of the BNP model on three control data sets

Data seta and methodb Expected FDR = 5%
Expected FDR = 1%
Actual FPR Total/correct Sensitivity Actual FPR Total/correct Sensitivity
% % % %
D1
    M1 2.23 719/703 78.29 0.53 567/564 62.81
    M2 2.59 733/714 79.51 0.89 674/668 74.39
    M3 2.20 820/802 89.31 0.40 758/755 84.08
    M4 2.72 810/788 87.75 1.39 722/712 79.29
D2
    M1 1.92 5,875/5,762 68.20 0.36 4,964/4,946 58.54
    M2 2.17 6,775/6,628 78.45 0.51 5,895/5,865 69.42
    M3 3.16 7,426/7,191 85.11 1.04 6,754/6,684 79.11
    M4 1.91 7,001/6,867 81.28 0.55 6,333/6,298 74.54
D3
    M1 0.13 10,284/10,271 74.80 0.03 9,182/9,179 83.70
    M2 0.42 11,477/11,429 93.14 0.17 10,699/10,681 87.04
    M3 0.50 11,983/11,923 97.16 0.09 11,388/11,378 92.72
    M4 0.32 10,885/10,850 88.42 0.16 10,117/10,101 82.32
a

D1, LCQ control data set; D2, LTQ control data set; D3, LTQ/FT control data set. For details see “Experimental Data Sets.”

b

M1, cutoff-based method; M2, PeptideProphet; M3, BNP model; M4, nonparametric model.