Skip to main content
. 2009 Feb 19;2:8. doi: 10.1186/1755-8794-2-8

Table 2.

CN Performance of different FFPE and fresh frozen sets

Institution (type) # with sufficient DNA # passed (% of all) # high quality (% of passed) median 2p-RSE of passed
CHTN (FFPE) 13 13 (100%) 11 (85%) 0.139

CHTN (FF) 12 12 (100%) 12 (100%) 0.102

CRUK (FFPE) 17 16 (94%) 12 (75%) 0.163

CRUK (FF) 17 17 (100%) 17 (100%) 0.142

Dana Farber (FFPE) 6 6 (100%) 1 (17%) 0.201

Leader (FFPE) 13 7 (54%) 4 (57%) 0.155

MD Anderson set1 (FFPE) 8 8 (100%) 7 (88%) 0.163

MD Anderson set2 (FFPE) 27 23 (85%) 18 (78%) 0.167

UCSF (FFPE) 9 9 (100%) 9 (100%) 0.115

UCSF (FF) 10 10 (100%) 10 (100%) 0.116

All FFPE 93 82 (88%) 62 (76%) 0.16

All FF* 39 39 (100%) 39 (100%) 0.129

* Fresh frozen