Skip to main content
. 2008 Sep 10;467(4):909–916. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0486-y

Table 2.

Templating results for uncemented prosthesis components

Templating method Rater Uncemented femoral component Uncemented acetabular component
Number of exact cases Number of ± 1 size cases* Number of exact cases Number of ± 1 size cases*
Total number of cases 16 (100%) 16 (100%) 16 (100%) 16 (100%)
Analog JBAvM 7 (43.8%) 15 (93.8%) 6 (37.5%) 14 (87.5%)
AMRPL 8 (50.0%) 15 (93.8%) 4 (25.0%) 10 (62.5%)
RPAJ 3 (18.8%) 14 (87.5%) 8 (50.0%) 15 (93.8%)
KEdK 3 (18.8%) 10 (62.5%) 9 (56.3%) 14 (87.5%)
Total 21 (32.8%) 54 (84.4%) 27 (42.2%) 53 (82.8%)
Digital 1 JBAvM 2 (12.5%) 10 (62.5%) 6 (37.5%) 12 (75.0%)
AMRPL 0 (0.0%) 1 (6.3%) 1 (6.3%) 5 (31.3%)
RPAJ 4 (25.0%) 13 (81.3%) 2 (12.5%) 11 (68.8%)
KEdK 1 (6.3%) 8 (50.0%) 7 (43.8%) 12 (75.0%)
Total 7 (10.9%) 32 (50.0%) 16 (25.0%) 40 (62.5%)
Digital 2 JBAvM 8 (50.0%) 13 (81.3%) 4 (25.0%) 14 (87.5%)
AMRPL 5 (31.3%) 11 (68.8%) 5 (31.3%) 12 (75.0%)
RPAJ 7 (43.8%) 15 (93.8%) 4 (25.0%) 13 (81.3%)
KEdK 7 (43.8%) 14 (87.5%) 3 (18.8%) 9 (56.3%)
Total 27 (42.2%) 53 (82.8%) 16 (25.0%) 48 (75.0%)

*± 1 size includes the exact templated cases; total of all raters.