Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Aug 28;73(3):418–425. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.032

Table 6.

Results of example pairwise comparison process. *

Risk of side
effects (0.31)
Ease of
admin
(0.16)
Effectiveness
(0.36)
Price
(0.20)
Score
Distrib
synthesis
Score
Ideal
synthesis
Drug A 0.31 0.25 0.37 0.60 39.5% 38.0%
Drug B 0.19 0.375 0.41 0.12 29.2% 30.6%
Drug C 0.50 0.375 0.24 0.28 31.3% 31.4%
CR 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.01 0.01
*

The numbers in parentheses under the criteria indicate their priorities relative to the goal. The numbers in the columns indicate the judged relative abilities of the three options to meet the criteria. Abbreviations: Ease of admin = ease of administration; CR = consistency ratio; distrib = distributive