Skip to main content
. 2009 Mar 9;4(3):e4742. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004742

Table 3. Glenoid cavity, femoral head and humeral head allometry.

Comparison a 95% CI
Femoral head radius ∝ femoral lengtha 1.26* 1.10–1.46
Femoral head radius ∝ femoral midshaft diametera 1.12 1.00–1.24
Humeral head radius ∝ humeral lengtha 1.34* 1.17–1.54
Humeral head radius ∝ femoral head radiusa 1.08 0.99–1.18
Humeral head radius ∝ humeral midshaft diametera 1.01 0.90–1.12
Glenoid radius ∝ humeral head radiusa 1.15 1.03–1.28
Glenoid radius ∝ scapular lengtha 1.48* 1.28–1.71

Scaling exponents (a) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for femoral head, humeral head and glenoid cavity spherical radii against bone lengths and diameters. The strongest allometry is evident between articular radii and bone lengths (*), which are strongly related to body size.

Isometry: a = 1.0.