Skip to main content
. 2009 Mar 4;101(5):341–349. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn498

Table 2.

Estimated absolute risk difference (percentage points) between goserelin and no goserelin for four outcomes

Women who did not take tamoxifen (n = 945)
Women who took tamoxifen (n = 1761)
No. of years after randomization Absolute risk difference* (95% confidence interval) Number needed to treat Absolute risk difference (95% confidence interval) Number needed to treat
Any event (recurrence, new tumor, or death)
    5 −10.7 (−14.7 to −6.0) 9 −1.9 (−5.1 to 1.4) 53
    10 −12.8 (−17.7 to −7.0) 8 −2.5 (−6.8 to 1.8) 40
    15 −13.9 (−19.4 to −7.5) 7 −2.8 (−7.7 to 2.0) 36
Death from any cause
    5 −4.6 (−7.1 to −1.4) 23 −1.3 (−3.4 to 1.1) 77
    10 −7.6 (−11.9 to −2.3) 13 −2.1 (−5.6 to 1.8) 48
    15 −9.2 (−14.4 to −2.7) 11 −2.5 (−6.8 to 2.2) 40
Breast cancer recurrence
    5 −10.1 (−14.3 to −5.4) 10 −1.9 (−5.0 to 1.4) 53
    10 −11.9 (−17.1 to −6.4) 8 −2.5 (−6.6 to 1.9) 40
    15 −12.8 (−18.4 to −6.8) 8 −2.8 (−7.5 to 2.1) 36
Death from breast cancer
    5 −4.4 (−7.0 to −1.2) 23 −1.3 (−3.3 to 1.1) 77
    10 −7.3 (−11.7 to −1.9) 14 −2.2 (−5.4 to 1.7) 45
    15 −8.5 (−13.7 to −2.2) 12 −2.6 (−6.6 to 2.1) 38
*

If P is the event rate in the no goserelin arm (eg, EFS rate or risk of recurrence) at a specified time point, then the absolute difference at this time is P − exp[hazard ratio × logeP ]. The hazard ratios were taken from Table 1 (tamoxifen = “No” or “Yes”).

Number needed to treat = 100% (absolute risk difference). The expected number of women who need to be treated with goserelin to avoid one event at the specified time point.