Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Mar 4.
Published in final edited form as: Nicotine Tob Res. 2008 Mar;10(3):507–517. doi: 10.1080/14622200801901971

Table 2.

Generalized estimation equation analyses of CESD scales predicting 7-day point prevalence smoking abstinence at 8, 16, and 26 weeks after quit date

Univariate effects
Unique effectsa
Unique effects beyond other relevant variablesb
OR (95% CI) p OR (95% CI) p OR (95% CI) p
Total Scale .92 (.87–.97) .001
Negative Affect .95 (.91–.99) .01 1.01 (.94–1.08) .82 1.01 (.94–1.09) .80
Somatic Features .93 (.88–.98) .004 .95 (.89–1.01) .11 .95 (.89–1.02) .13
Positive Affect 1.10 (1.06–1.14) <.0001 1.09 (1.03–1.15) .002 1.09 (1.03–1.15) .002
Interpersonal Disturbance 1.00 (.94–1.05) .89 1.03 (.98–1.09) .25 1.03 (.97–1.09) .28

Note. Lower ORs indicate that higher scores on the CESD subscale predict reduced odds of abstinence OR=odds ratio of standardized scores (z-scores). OR=1.00 means nonsignificant effect. CI=Confidence Interval. CESD=Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. FTND=Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence.

a

Model included all four CESD subscales simultaneously included as predictors.

b

Model included all four CESD subscales, FTND scores, cigarettes smoked per day, and past history of depression as predictors.