. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Dec 1.

Published in final edited form as: Brain Lang. 2007 Dec 26;107(3):203–219. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2007.11.004

Table 3.

Results from Experiment 2 for Broca’s patients and unimpaired controls^a

	Probe position 1 Baseline	Probe position 2 GAP position	Probe position 3 500 ms post GAP
Age-matched controls (n = 6)
Related visual probe	937 (37)	926 (53)	896 (45)
Control visual probe	935 (34)	902 (45)	920 (46)
Difference (control—related)	-2^ns	-24^ns	+46^p<.05
Broca’s patients (n = 8)
Related visual probe	1191 (134)	1170 (129)	1171 (136)
Control visual probe	1195 (133)	1246 (138)	1218 (143)
Difference (control—related)	+4^ns	+76^p<.05	+47^p<.05

Mean response times (milliseconds) and standard errors (in parentheses) are shown for related and control visual probes at three probe positions, indicated by superscript numerals in the example sentence: “The audience liked the wrestleri that the¹ parish priest condemned (t)_i² for foul³ language.” Priming is indicated by a significant (positive) difference between the control and related visual probes.