Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Mar 4.
Published in final edited form as: Circ Res. 2008 Jul 25;103(5):493–501. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.181487

Table 1.

Echocardiographic data in FOG-2 transgenic and non-transgenic mice

NTg (n=16) Tg (n=9) P value
Heart Rate (bpm) 376±27 389±45 NS
Anterior Wall Thickness (mm) 0.73±0.04 0.75±0.04 NS
Posterior Wall Thickness (mm) 0.70±0.02 0.75±0.04 NS
LVEDD (mm) 3.42±0.01 3.86±0.02 0.07
LVESD (mm) 2.28±0.02 2.91±0.02 0.02
Fractional Shortening (%) 34±3 25±2 0.03

Data are mean ± SEM. Mice were 8–10 wk of age. LVEDD, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter. LVESD, left ventricular end-systolic diameter. Significance of differences between means was determined by unpaired t-test. p<0.05 was accepted as significant.