Skip to main content
. 2008 May-Jun;5(1):22–35.

TABLE 1.

A comparison of important clinical approval endpoints

Endpoint Regulatory evidence Study design Advantages Disadvantages
Overall survival Clinical benefit for regular approval
  • Randomized studies essential

  • Blinding not essential

  • Universally accepted direct measure of benefit

  • Easily measured

  • Precisely measured

  • May involve larger studies

  • May be affected by crossover therapy and sequential therapy

  • Includes noncancer deaths

Symptom endpoints (patient- reported outcomes) Clinical benefit for regular approval
  • Randomized, blinded studies

  • Patient perspective of direct clinical benefit

  • Blinding is often difficult

  • Data are frequently missing or incomplete

  • Clinical significance of small changes is unknown

  • Multiple analyses

  • Lack of validated instruments

Disease-free survival Surrogate for accelerated approval or regular approval*
  • Randomized studies essential

  • Blinding preferred

  • Blinded review recommended

  • Smaller sample size and shorter follow-up necessary compared with survival studies

  • Not statistically validated as surrogate for overall survival in all settings

  • Not precisely measured; subject to assessment bias, particularly in open-label studies

  • Definitions vary among studies

Objective response rate Surrogate for accelerated approval or regular approval*
  • Single-arm or randomized studies can be used

  • Blinding preferred in comparative studies

  • Blinded review recommended

  • Can be assessed in single-arm studies

  • Assessed earlier and in smaller studies compared with survival studies

  • Effect attributable to drug, not natural history

  • Not a direct measure of benefit

  • Not a comprehensive measure of drug activity

  • Measures only a subset of patients who benefit

Complete response Surrogate for accelerated approval or regular approval*
  • Single-arm or randomized studies can be used

  • Blinding preferred in comparative studies

  • Blinded review recommended

  • Can be assessed in single-arm studies

  • Durable complete responses can represent clinical benefit

  • Assessed earlier and in smaller studies compared with survival studies

  • Not a direct measure of benefit

  • Not a comprehensive measure of drug activity

  • Measures only a subset of patients who benefit

Progression- free survival (includes all deaths) or time to progression (deaths before progression censored) Surrogate for accelerated approval or regular approval*
  • Randomized studies essential

  • Blinding preferred

  • Blinded review recommended

  • Smaller sample size and shorter follow-up necessary compared with survival studies

  • Measurement of stable disease included

  • Not affected by crossover or subsequent therapies

  • Generally based on objective and quantitative assessment

  • Not statistically validated as surrogate for survival in all settings

  • Not precisely measured; subject to assessment bias, particularly in open-label studies

  • Definitions vary among studies

  • Frequent radiological or other assessments

  • Involves balanced timing of assessment among treatment arms

*

Adequacy as a surrogate endpoint for accelerated approval or regular approval is highly dependent upon other factors, such as effect size, effect duration, and benefits of other available therapy. Source: FDA 2007