Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Psychiatry. 2008 May 27;64(5):407–418. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.03.018

Table 7.

Main effects across all participants: Incongruous versus Congruous sentences

No. Region Lat. BA Area mm2 Tal. x, y, z p Area mm2 Tal. x, y, z p Area mm2 Tal. x, y, z p
INCONGRUOUS > NORMAL Main effect of Congruity Incongruous > Congruous Controls: Incongruous > Normal Patients: Incongruous > Normal
1 Inferior frontal gyrus L 45 362 −49 25 8 .00065 380 −50 32 10 .00159 NS
R 1250 49 22 10 .00018 1782 49 36 8 .00081 NS
2 Precentral gyrus (inferior) L 6 527 −43 3 12 .00021 752 −44 3 14 .00129 NS

No. corresponds directly to cluster labels in Figure 5. When clusters or Brodmann Areas (BAs) span over more than one region, both regions/BAs are indicated, separated by a hash sign. Lat.: Laterality. Tal. (Talairach) coordinates. All clusters indicated in p column reached cluster-level significance, p < 0.05 corrected across the whole cortex, except for those marked with ^ that reached a voxel-wise significance of p < 0.05, uncorrected across the cortex. NS: non-significant.