Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Comput Neurosci. 2008 Aug 5;26(2):203–218. doi: 10.1007/s10827-008-0107-5

Figure 3. Distribution of correlation coefficients between receptive fields determined from Cartesian and polar stimulus sets.

Figure 3

Left: stimulus-dependent changes in filters calculated by reverse correlation; right: stimulus-dependent changes in filters calculated by MID. For both kinds of models, significant context-dependent changes (correlation coefficients < 1) are prevalent. Cells with no significant changes (p>0.05) are shown in white, those with significant changes in gray (0.01<p<0.05) and black (p<0.01). The abscissa labels indicate the filters whose profiles are compared. Debiasing (see Supplementary Material) can result in estimated correlation coefficients < 0.