Skip to main content
. 2007 Apr 4;13:545–548.

Table 3. Two-way analyses of complement factor H 402 and rs11200638.


PAR%
(95% CI)
M-H test: p-value
Model for rs11200638
CFH 402
rs11200638
CFH 402
rs11200638
LRT p-value
AIC value
Full
3.4 (0, 9.7)
58.3 (50.5, 64.1)
0.07
8.30E-08
0.03
221.8
Recessive
4.6 (0, 10.7)
44 (40.5, 54.0)
0.23
6.20E-09
0.12
221.5
Multiplicative
1.7 (0, 7.8)
79.8 (73.0, 88.1)
*
*
0.02
225.7
Dominant 2.2 (0, 13.7) 58.6 (43.9, 78.9) 0.91 5.80E-04 0.1 246.9

Four genotypic models for rs11200638 are considered: Let r0, r1, and r2 be the marginal relative risks for genotypes GG, GA, and AA. Then, recessive model implies r0=r1; multiplicative model implies r1=r0r2; dominant model implies r2=r1; full model does not have any restriction on relative risks except that r0, r1, r2>0. The 95% confidence intervals (CI) of population attributable risk (PAR) were obtained via a bootstrap re-sampling method with 999 replicates. Mantel-Hanzel (M-H) tests are conducted for one SNP association adjusted for the other SNP; likelihood ratio tests (LRT) for joint single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) association under a two-way multiplicative model: the relative risk (or OR) for any genotype pair (A, B) relative to the baseline pair (A0, B0) is the product of relative risk (or OR) of A relative to A0 and that of B relative to B0. AIC denotes the Akaike's information criterion to access goodness-of-fit for the rs11200638 model.