Skip to main content
. 2007 Aug 17;44(12):763–771. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2007.050450

Table 1 Proportion of patients with KRAS, BRAF, and MEK1/2 mutations in our study and a review of the literature.

Niihori et al,13 Narumi et al25 Rodriguez‐Viciana et al14 Schubbert et al15 Carta et al16 Rauen et al29 Zenker et al21 This study
CFC CFC CFC NS PTPN11 CFC NS PTPN11 CS HRAS‐ CFC CS HRAS NS PTPN11 CFC CS HRAS‐ NS PTPN11
Patients, n 56 23 12 175 8 87 3 21 3 236 40 20 70
KRAS, n (%) 3 (5.5) 1 (8.3) 5 (3) 0 2 (2.3) 2 +1CFC/NS (14.3) 2 (66.7) 7 (3) 1 (2.5) 2 (10) 4 (5.7)
BRAF, n (%) 24 (43) 18 (78) 2 (66.7) 14 (35) 8 (40) 0
MEK1, n (%) 4 (7) 2 (9) 4 (10) 4 (20) 3 (4.3)
MEK2, n (%) 4 (7) 1 (4.3) 4 (10) 0 0
Patients with a mutation, n (%) 35 (62.5) 21 (91.3) 1 (8.3) 5 (3) 0 2 (2.3) 2 (66.7) 3 (14.3) 2 (66.7) 7 (3) 23 (57.5) 14 (70) 7 (10)

CFC, cardio‐facio‐cutaneous syndrome; CS, Costello syndrome; NS, Noonan syndrome.