Skip to main content
. 2009 Mar 20;5(3):e1000433. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000433

Table 2. Multiple regression analysis of warfarin dose in the GWAS, replication and combined panels.

Predictor WARG GWAS (1053) Replication (588) Combined (1641)
Effect on doseb R 2 P-value Effect on doseb R 2 P-value Effect on doseb R 2 P-value
Estimate (95% CI) Estimate (95% CI) Estimate (95% CI)
VKORC1 rs9923231 (C->T, 0.402)a −0.96 (−1.03, −0.89) 0.283 1.6E-122 −0.99 (−1.09, −0.88) 0.284 5.0E-62 −0.97 (−1.02, −0.91) 0.283 2.7E-181
CYP2C9*3 rs1057910 (Ile359Leu, 0.070)a −1.13 (−1.26, −1.00) 0.075 2.6E-55 −1.08 (−1.27, −0.89) 0.089 2.3E-26 −1.11 (−1.22, −1.00) 0.080 2.6E-79
CYP2C9*2 rs1799853 (Arg144Cys, 0.109)a −0.63 (−0.74, −0.52) 0.048 1.7E-28 −0.40 (−0.55, −0.24) 0.023 5.5E-07 −0.54 (−0.63, −0.45) 0.038 1.1E-31
CYP4F2 rs2108622 (Val433Met, 0.240)a 0.25 (0.17, 0.33) 0.016 8.3E-10 0.16 (0.05, 0.27) 0.005 c0.0029 0.21 (0.14, 0.27) 0.011 3.3E-10
Age −0.04 (−0.04, −0.03) 0.170 1.9E-63 −0.03 (−0.04, −0.03) 0.129 1.7E-31 −0.04 (−0.04, −0.03) 0.155 1.2E-111
Sex (male) 0.35 (0.25, 0.45) 0.017 7.6E-12 0.25 (0.10, 0.40) 0.009 0.001 0.30 (0.22, 0.38) 0.013 1.6E-12
a

In parenthesis are major/minor allele, and minor allele frequency.

b

Effect of individual predictor on dose is indicated by regression coefficient and 95% confidence interval, proportion of explained variance (R 2) and P-value.

c

Association in same direction as GWAS was assessed by a one-tailed test.